The United States plays a pivotal role in European security, primarily through NATO and Article V of the NATO Washington Treaty. The latter guarantees that, should they come under attack, the United States will come to the European signatories’ assistance. Alongside strong bilateral ties, the US also engages in the OSCE.Transatlantic cooperation faced strains under Donald Trump’s first administration. His so-called »America First« agenda weakened trust among US allies. President Joe Biden sought to rebuild that trust, focusing on supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression and containing China through allied cooperation. The upcoming Trump administration will probably revert to more transactional policies, including a reduced commitment to multilateral alliances. This raises serious concerns for Ukraine’s defence and broader European security, as Trump could impose a joint China policy as a possible condition of security. With rising tensions involving China, a fractured US-Europe relationship would leave Europe more vulnerable.
The United States plays a pivotal role in European security, primarily through NATO and Article V of the NATO Washington Treaty. The latter guarantees that, should they come under attack, the United States will come to the European signatories’ assistance. Alongside strong bilateral ties, the US also engages in the OSCE.
Transatlantic cooperation faced strains under Donald Trump’s first administration. His so-called »America First« agenda weakened trust among US allies. President Joe Biden sought to rebuild that trust, focusing on supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression and containing China through allied cooperation. The upcoming Trump administration will probably revert to more transactional policies, including a reduced commitment to multilateral alliances. This raises serious concerns for Ukraine’s defence and broader European security, as Trump could impose a joint China policy as a possible condition of security. With rising tensions involving China, a fractured US-Europe relationship would leave Europe more vulnerable.
Americans appear more secure, as their overall level of concern is relatively low compared with other polled nations. Having said that, their prevailing concerns are economic crises (76%), wars and conflicts (75%) and cyber-attacks (at 71%, higher than the survey average of 64%).
Americans appear most satisfied regarding their country’s international standing. Only 38% feel that their country does not have the status it deserves, while 47% believe it does. Some 61% perceive their well-being as linked to the prosperity of other countries, showing an increased understanding of interconnected global prosperity (2021: 54%).
Americans exhibit moderate support for multilateralism, a slight improvement on the last survey. A majority support a stronger role for the UN (57%), NATO (53%, but only 42% among those aged 18–29), and the EU (46%). But although 36% support a bigger role for the OSCE, 16% answer ‘don’t know’ and 30% admit to being unfamiliar with the organisation.
71% of Americans wish to reduce dependence on China, compared with 53% on average in polled EU countries.
Americans believe that the age of American supremacy may be over (43% agree, 39% oppose). Most polled countries agree, except for outliers such as Georgia (54%) and Ukraine (52%), who still believe in it. Americans appear to anticipate an era defined by wars, conflicts and a »my country first« approach. Confidence in laws and rules in international relations persists, with only 38% professing to believe that they are no longer relevant (much lower than the 47% survey average).
In the international context, the US compared with the EU sees itself as engaged in a broader conflict with both Russia and China. US–Russia (57%) and US–China (53%) relations are perceived as characterised by contradictory interests, followed by EU–China (43%). However, Americans’ perceptions of these contradictions appear to be less pronounced than those of other respondents.
Russia perceives the US as its main adversary. These days, however, the US does not reciprocate this view, instead focusing on China, particularly in economic terms. For instance, there is a strong US desire to reduce dependence on China, even if it negatively impacts living standards (71%, one of the highest values in the survey). The average of polled EU citizens is much lower at 53%. At the same time, support for closer cooperation with China increased among American respondents, rising from 30% in 2021 to 40%. Tensions and structural challenges define US–China relations: on average, 54% of Americans and 53% of respondents in our 14-country sample fear a new Cold War.
The Biden administration has struggled to rally European allies behind its China policy, and as already mentioned, the Trump administration may link support on this issue to American participation in European security.
When it comes to Russia, Americans demonstrate a more pragmatic perception. Closer cooperation is rejected by 53%, but 31% (above the NATO average of 25%) favour it. Nevertheless, 68% desire to minimise dependence on Russia. Fears that broader global conflicts may impact the US remain high. Some 77% of Americans express concern about a direct impact of wars on their country, and 41% (above the 32% survey average) are worried about a new world war.
Americans view themselves as highly capable of defence in the event of a Russian attack, with 70% expressing confidence, much higher than the 28% average.
70% of Americans view their country as highly capable of defence in the event of a Russian attack.
Perceptions of media reporting are split, with 39% seeing it as biased and 37% (2021: 31%) as objective. America’s media landscape is politicised and polarised. Media outlets have long reflected partisan divides, including greater influence of billionaires. This is partly reflected in perceptions of objectivity, which are significantly stronger among Democrats (48%) than among Republicans (31%).
With President Biden fostering closer ties, the US and the EU have strengthened their transatlantic security partnership. Public opinion reflects broad support for closer cooperation with the EU. However, future dynamics under president Trump remain uncertain.
When it comes to European security, Russia is seen as the primary threat (73%). But US respondents’ perception of the Chinese threat (59%) is significantly higher than the 44% EU average. Some 40% of Americans view NATO enlargement as a potential threat to European security, a substantially higher proportion than before Russia started its full-scale war against Ukraine (2021: 28%). Only 36% perceive EU enlargement towards the East as a threat.
44% endorse providing additional weapons to Ukraine, thereof 60% Democrats and 35% Republicans.
The US has long advocated that Europe should step up its responsibility for its own defence. In line with that, Americans have more confidence (41%) in Europe's defence capabilities without US involvement than the European average (31%). Notably, however, 71% still support continuing US provision of security for Europe. Some 48% cite conditions, such as a fairer financial contribution from Europe (33%) and direct European support for US defence expenditures (30%), but a mere 11% cite European support for US China policy as a condition. Support for an EU Army has also surged, increasing from 39% in 2021 to 52%. This may reflect the wish that Europe take care of its own defence. Support for the EU's role in promoting international peace through non-military means, such as diplomacy, has risen from 56% in 2021 to 63%. In EU security policies, Americans favour leadership by the Weimar Triangle of Germany, France and Poland (35%), but a notable 25% answer ‘don’t know’.
Since February 2022, Washington has led support for Kyiv and strengthened NATO's deterrence capabilities. The US has been the major provider of military aid to Ukraine and crucial in coordinating NATO’s response. The majority of Americans hold Russia responsible for the war, which over half believe is aimed at expanding Russia’s territory. Overall, in accordance with the NATO average there is support for further aid to Ukraine, with 50% of Americans in favour (although while 70% of Democrats are on board, only 33% of Republicans follow suit). Furthermore, 37% of Americans would prefer a diplomatic solution, 31% favour aid until victory for Ukraine, and 19% favour a neutral stance.
Providing additional weapons to Ukraine is endorsed by 44% (60% Democrats, 35% Republicans), the third-highest value among polled NATO countries. Notably 23% are in favour of sending troops, a level of support surpassed only by Sweden (27%).
Economic and humanitarian aid each receive support from just under 25%. Support for Ukraine’s integration into NATO and the EU has increased significantly, with approval for NATO membership rising from 38% in 2021 to 54%, and for EU membership from 37% to 53%.
Diplomacy is seen as the most likely path to ending the war, with 35% expecting a negotiated settlement, while 25% foresee no end to the conflict. However, 36% believe it is most important to stop the war even if it means Ukraine losing control of some areas to Russia. Some 31% support continuing the war to restore Ukraine’s territorial integrity. Meanwhile, 12% consider it most important that Russia lose the war, even if it means a risk of escalation. Among Americans, there is notable optimism that the war will end within the next 12 months, second only to Russia.
The outlook for the next five years appears less bleak than in 2021, with expected improvements in the US (41%) and in Europe (31%). Only regarding global developments does pessimism (38%) exceed optimism (30%).
The main thrust of public sentiment is towards domestic affairs. Americans therefore remain cautious about taking on more international responsibilities, with only a slight increase in support under Biden from 38% in 2021 to 42%. However, support for reducing dependency on states with different values is notably high at 71% and has increased significantly (2021: 51%). Although 65% prioritise their own well-being over international involvement, 57% support an active foreign policy.
Foreign policy priorities are fighting terrorism and extremism (57%), addressing human rights violations (43%), tackling climate change (39%) and resolving geopolitical tensions (31%, well up from 18% in 2021). When asked about strategies for promoting peace, Americans favour international institutions (38%), diplomatic efforts (36%) and promotion of economic interdependence (33%, the highest value in the poll). Isolationist sentiments are reflected in preferences regarding the future focus of US foreign policy, but without significant changes compared with 2021. Most respondents prefer limitations on US involvement (29%), followed by a focus on China (15%), Europe (14%) and the Middle East (12%). However, a significant portion (23%) responded ‘don’t know’.
A worrying 12% believe that no action is needed on climate change, second-highest value in the poll after Russia.
Diplomatic measures are seen as effective and legitimate, though the US has the lowest legitimacy rating. Public opinion is divided on military interventions (43% opposed, 41% in favour), with support higher than average (30%), similar to Sweden and Türkiye. Attitudes towards nuclear weapons are concerning: 57% oppose their use, the lowest among polled countries, while a worrying 36% would agree to their use as a last resort.
Climate change remains a critical concern, especially because the Trump administration seems intent on withdrawing from the Paris Agreement once again. The majority are dissatisfied with domestic and international climate policies, but more satisfied than average. Almost 50% favour doing everything possible, while 29% prefer adaptation. However, a worrying 12% believe that no action is needed on climate change, the second-highest value in the poll after Russia (26%). While 68% view international collaboration as essential to address global climate change, 59% prioritise securing borders amid potential instability. Despite their national wealth, Americans are among the least approving of support for poorer nations.
Raising military spending has gained stronger endorsement, from 40% in 2021 to 48%. Some 55% would prefer to fund social and economic affairs over defence (29%). Funding preferences include a special levy on the rich (36%).
Another 32% favour cuts in other budgets, one of the highest figures in the poll, raising concerns about social programmes and services.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/