Russia re-emerged when the Soviet Union fell apart 30 years ago. During that period it has sought status parity with other global powers, especially the United States. A constitutional reform in 2020 enabled Putin to remove the limitations on his eligibility for election, allowing him to rule until 2036. On top of that the Russian political and legal systems are characterised by staged elections, politically motivated trials and repression. After Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, relations with Ukraine and EU countries deteriorated. The 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in violation of international law, led to Western military and economic support for Ukraine, deepening the divide. In response, Russia has increasingly strengthened economic and military ties with China, while facing sanctions from the EU and the US. These sanctions are aimed at weakening Russia’s economy and military, but are being partially circumvented with the complicity of third countries.Until very recently Russia was also able to maintain a strategic presence in the Middle East, where it supported the brutal regime of Bashar al-Assad. After being ousted from power, Assad sought asylum in Russia.
Russia re-emerged when the Soviet Union fell apart 30 years ago. During that period it has sought status parity with other global powers, especially the United States. A constitutional reform in 2020 enabled Putin to remove the limitations on his eligibility for election, allowing him to rule until 2036. On top of that the Russian political and legal systems are characterised by staged elections, politically motivated trials and repression. After Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, relations with Ukraine and EU countries deteriorated. The 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in violation of international law, led to Western military and economic support for Ukraine, deepening the divide. In response, Russia has increasingly strengthened economic and military ties with China, while facing sanctions from the EU and the US. These sanctions are aimed at weakening Russia’s economy and military, but are being partially circumvented with the complicity of third countries.
Until very recently Russia was also able to maintain a strategic presence in the Middle East, where it supported the brutal regime of Bashar al-Assad. After being ousted from power, Assad sought asylum in Russia.
Concerns about one’s personal future are pervasive in Russia (80%). Opinions on one’s personal economic situation are divided: 47% don’t expect a deterioration, while 46% do, with younger respondents expressing higher levels of concern. Although the Russian economy has proved remarkably adaptable and resilient in the face of the war and ensuing sanctions, the rouble has been tanking, making imports more expensive and putting a strain on Russia’s economy.
When it comes to Russia’s global standing, 54% of respondents believe it lacks the status it deserves globally, while 38% think it receives the status it merits, slightly above the poll average (32%). Half of Russians see their well-being linked to the prosperity of other countries, even amid the sanctions in response to the war against Ukraine, aimed at isolating Russia.
While the West in general is seen as an enemy, the US is seen as much more of an adversary than the EU.
Russian perspectives differ from others in the survey, but shared concerns persist. Russian respondents' views are therefore distinct, but not as much as might be assumed.
Russian public opinion reveals a significant hostility towards a greater role for international organisations. The UN is viewed most positively with regard to taking on a larger role, with 51% approval, slightly higher than in Germany (48%) but below the global average. The OSCE follows closely with 48% support. Not surprising, a bigger role for NATO meets overwhelming disapproval (70%).
Russian views on global power dynamics indicate their belief in the end of Western dominance. While the West in general is seen as an enemy, the US is seen as much more of an adversary than the EU. This is mirrored in perceptions of contradictory interests between Russia and the US (84%) and Russia and the EU (68%). Notably, both values have nearly doubled since the last survey in 2021, reflecting a new climate of confrontation. The US remains the main adversary in the eyes of respondents. A majority believe that the era of American supremacy is over. Relatedly, cooperation with the US is anathema, rejected by almost 70%.
Russians overwhelmingly cite the US (55%) as a threat to their country, followed a long way behind by the UK (10%). Ukraine and China are perceived as threats by only 4% of respondents, while NATO and the EU are mentioned by negligible percentages. About 1% mention ‘Russia is its own enemy’.
The EU retains a generally positive image, although opinion is divided. Interestingly, despite the EU's increasing distancing from Russia because of the war against Ukraine, identification with European culture in Russia has endured (69%, compared with 65% in 2021). While 77% see EU policies as conflicting with Russian interests, attitudes towards increased cooperation are mixed (48% opposed and 45% in favour). Russians don’t believe that the EU is becoming a global power, and a bigger role for it in the future is rejected (54%). However, Russians attribute military strength to the EU, as 68% believe the EU can defend itself without US support, more than double the average of polled European countries (32%). Here they follow the trend that the EU is perceived to be stronger by outside countries than by its own members.
In response to international sanctions, Russia has increasingly turned eastward. Russian respondents favour further collaboration with China, and almost 80% perceive Russian and Chinese interests as not contradictory.
Notably, nearly 70% of Russians see their country emerging as a new leader among non-Western countries, the highest percentage in the poll, coupled with a »my country first« approach. However, fewer Russians anticipate this compared with the poll average (45% vs 64%).
Russians expect an era of wars and conflicts (58%). A notable majority (62%) fear that wars and conflicts will impact Russia in the future, though this is ten points lower than the poll average (72%). Only 29% of Russians fear a new world war, however. Their concerns focus on tensions between Russia and the West, as 64% believe new wars in Europe are likely because of these growing tensions. About 61% predict a direct military confrontation between Russia and the West. This is much higher than the 48% average of the EU, UK and US, showing stronger concerns in Russia. Additionally, 57% foresee a new Cold War, a view shared by 54% of respondents in the US.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a violation of international law. This disregard for international rules is shared by 64% of respondents, the highest proportion in the survey, who believe that international law is no longer relevant. Russians under 30 maintain a slightly stronger belief in international law (39%).
70% of Russians see their country emerging as a new leader among non-Western countries.
Russian perceptions of the war contrast sharply with international viewpoints. Only Serbians display similar attitudes.
Russia annexed Crimea in violation of international law in 2014 and invaded Ukraine in February 2022. Russian disinformation and propaganda include attempts to discredit Ukraine. When asked about reasons for the war, respondents cite protection of Russian interests (37%), the fight against fascism (23%), and protection of the Russian-speaking population in the Donbas (21%).
Some 73% of Russians blame the US for the war, well up from 51% in 2021. This aligns with Russian propaganda, which portrays the West as the aggressor. This is followed by almost the same shares for the EU (32%) and Ukraine (30%, although this has fallen substantially from 55% in 2021). However, only 22% attribute responsibility to Russia, in stark contrast to the Western perspective, although this figure rises to 44% among respondents under 30. Similarly, only slightly lower than their European peers, a majority (62%) believe that ending the war is crucial for improving European security.
44% among Russians under 30 attribute responsibility for the war against Ukraine to Russia.
As expected, a majority of Russians oppose Ukraine's membership of NATO or the EU, reflecting longstanding concerns. Only Serbians share this view, while all other polled nations take more favourable stances. Some 69% of Russians see NATO enlargement as a threat to European security, while 51% hold similar concerns about EU expansion. This highlights a consistent view: NATO (or the US), not the EU, is seen as the primary adversary. Putin’s propaganda shapes public opinion in Russia, although Russian respondents share some perceptions with other polled nations, offering a glimpse of potential common ground. For example, concerns about nuclear escalation are widespread (65%). About 45% of Russians do not believe the war will end within the next 12 months, even higher than the poll average of 37%. Remarkably, even in Russia only 36% of respondents believe that Russia is going to prevail militarily. They also believe that the war will end with a diplomatic solution.
Only 36% of respondents believe that Russia is going to prevail militarily. Majority believe in a diplomatic solution and support negotiations without preconditions.
There is growing acceptance in Russia that it is time to start negotiations. Some 76% see it as unacceptable not to start negotiations at all. Over half (54%) would accept negotiations without preconditions. The most acceptable conditions for negotiations include Ukraine releasing all prisoners of war (89%) and ceasing hostilities (82%), and Ukraine’s recognition of Russia’s sovereignty over the annexed regions (73%). However, a majority find it unacceptable for Russia to withdraw all forces (63%). Opinions are mixed regarding internationally mediated negotiations (50% unacceptable, 41% acceptable), which is notable given Russia’s traditional resistance to external involvement in its security affairs. Nonetheless, this partial openness to diplomatic engagement could serve as a basis for future peace efforts.
Looking ahead over the next five years, Russians remain optimistic about their own country (57%), a view that has risen significantly compared with 2021 (18%, up from 39%). They are notably more pessimistic about Europe, while their outlook on global developments is mixed (34% foresee deterioration, 33% improvement).
Russian respondents display a pragmatic and interventionist stance. This is coupled with a focus on their well-being and a desire to avoid international involvements (56%). They show the highest support for cooperation with any country, even those that do not share their values, if they promote peace (78%). Approval for military interventions has risen from 37% in 2021 to 47%, but 45% remain opposed.
Diplomatic negotiations are widely viewed as legitimate by an overwhelming majority (87%). Only 34% view economic sanctions and 29% military interventions as legitimate. The rejection of sanctions is expected, given the impact of the current sanctions regime on people’s everyday lives.
Putin's new doctrine has lowered the nuclear threshold, using threats and nuclear deployments to signal a readiness to escalate, and correspondingly, respondents' attitudes toward nuclear weapons are particularly concerning. While 67% reject their use, 16% consider them a last resort, and a notable 17% see them as a means of defending vital interests, the highest proportion in the poll.
Support for increasing military spending has surged, with 67% in favour, making it one of the highest rates in the poll, more than double the figure in 2021 (32%). However, respondents are nearly evenly split when asked to prioritise social and economic (45%) or defence spending (44%). This is a notable difference from Ukraine, where defence spending has the highest priority. A majority support funding defence through a special levy on the rich, while only 9% back cuts to social and economic spending, the lowest figure in the poll.
67% support increased military spending, more than double the figure in 2021.
Media in Russia are tightly controlled by the state, undermining space for independent journalism. The invasion of Ukraine intensified this, forcing many independent journalists and outlets to flee.
Notably, public perceptions of media objectivity have shifted significantly. The percentage viewing the media as biased has dropped from 54% in 2021 to 34%, while the perception of media objectivity rose from 33% in 2021 to 60%. Regarding news consumption, 47% of Russians cite television as their primary source of information. Meanwhile, 40% rely on social networks, with Telegram being especially popular among younger respondents. Respondents who consume online media view media reporting as more biased (about 85%), while those who rely on TV, radio or print see it as more objective (about 80%). Perceptions of social media are more balanced.
The data reveal stark differences in how Russians perceive the conflict based on their view of media objectivity. Those trusting »objective« media cite Russia's protection of its interests, fighting fascism and defending the Russian-speaking population in the Donbas as reasons for the invasion. Those who perceive the media as biased often state ‘don’t know’ or suggest motives such as seeking global power. Regarding the war's outcome, respondents who trust in an objective media believe in Russia's military victory, while others foresee no resolution or a diplomatic settlement. In short, state propaganda is working, but it has limits: those who trust state-controlled media narratives tend to align with the government's views on the invasion and predict a Russian military victory. Conversely, those who view the media as biased are more sceptical.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/