Strategically located in the Mediterranean, Italy is a founding member of both NATO and the European Union. Its post-war recovery was driven by a strong commitment to multilateralism, and today it plays a key role in Europe politically, economically, militarily and culturally. Despite being the third-largest economy in the Eurozone, it was hit particularly hard by the 2008 financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, exacerbating the divide between the richer North and the poorer South.In 2022, Giorgia Meloni’s election marked a shift toward right-wing policies. While her government has positioned itself officially as pro-European, it has also adopted critical views on the EU and called for constitutional changes. These moves signal a shift towards a stronger nationalistic approach, contrasting with Italy's traditional democratic and multilateral values. Italians prioritise peaceful cooperation more than other polled EU and NATO countries. Italy is more restrained in military spending and interventions, not due to idealism but because of a commitment to peace and non-violence, despite shared security concerns.
Strategically located in the Mediterranean, Italy is a founding member of both NATO and the European Union. Its post-war recovery was driven by a strong commitment to multilateralism, and today it plays a key role in Europe politically, economically, militarily and culturally. Despite being the third-largest economy in the Eurozone, it was hit particularly hard by the 2008 financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, exacerbating the divide between the richer North and the poorer South.
In 2022, Giorgia Meloni’s election marked a shift toward right-wing policies. While her government has positioned itself officially as pro-European, it has also adopted critical views on the EU and called for constitutional changes. These moves signal a shift towards a stronger nationalistic approach, contrasting with Italy's traditional democratic and multilateral values. Italians prioritise peaceful cooperation more than other polled EU and NATO countries. Italy is more restrained in military spending and interventions, not due to idealism but because of a commitment to peace and non-violence, despite shared security concerns.
A majority of 69% are concerned about their future. Italians’ biggest concerns are wars and conflicts, inflation and economic crises (over 80%). Uncontrolled migration (with 63%) ranks low, despite Meloni's pivotal role in shaping Europe's migration agenda.
Italy’s status dissatisfaction (63%) has improved slightly since the survey in 2021 (68%). But it still remains among the EU's highest, alongside Poland. Only 34% believe that the current government has improved Italy’s international reputation. Some 64% view Italy’s prosperity as linked to the well-being of other countries, similar to other polled EU countries.
Italy's rightward shift has led to an ambivalent strategy: pragmatic and opportunistic. Despite Meloni’s Eurosceptic roots, she balances nationalist priorities with increased influence in European decision-making.
Italians reveal mixed sentiments about the EU's role and Italy's position within it. Italian respondents are least likely to believe that the EU will emerge as a major global power (33%). However, regarding Italy's current role and future course of action in the EU, 40% believe it is Italy's duty to strengthen European institutions, the highest value among polled countries (Poland, France and Germany). Additionally, 33% support a stronger EU leadership role, second only to Poland. Only 14% favour less EU engagement, lower than Germany (28%) and France (27%). At the same time, Italian public opinion shows growing ambivalence. Although the EU is the most valued organisation (63%), support for deeper cooperation has declined, and concerns over internal conflicts have risen (67%, above the EU average). Italians remain committed to European integration but are wary of the EU's cohesion and global influence.
Italians show commitment to international institutions, as support for the OSCE has risen to 52%, reflecting a desire for peace. Italians are divided on NATO, with 43% opposing a bigger role, particularly among older generations, and 39% favouring it. Support for cooperating with Russia dropped from 45% in 2021 to 26%, and for the US from 54% to 43%, and remained stable in relation to China. Italy demonstrates a strong sense of pragmatism, adapting to benefit itself while avoiding taking sides.
Nearly half disagree that the EU and the US have contradictory interests. Italians perceive a notable contradiction with regard to US–Russia relations (59%). Italy has one of the lowest perceptions of EU-Russia contradictions (50%) and the highest support among EU countries (64%) for cooperation with non-like-minded countries if it promotes peace and security. Some 61% support less dependence on Russia, 53% on China.
Media reporting is seen as lacking objectivity (54%); only 29% consider it objective. Nevertheless, concerns over press freedom have risen due to government control plans.
Italians advocate for peace and have a relatively subdued perception of threats. Italians foresee an emerging era of wars and conflicts but they do not appear to be too worried by recent events, as a new world war or a direct military confrontation between Russia and the West is not widely perceived as likely.
Russia is identified as the greatest threat for Europe, with concerns rising sharply from 36% in 2021 to 67% in 2024. Unlike in other NATO countries, concerns about the US as a threat have grown from 21% to 35%. This places the US nearly on a par with China (37%).
Changes in the security situation are regarded with scepticism. NATO enlargement is seen as a major threat by 52%, higher than in other NATO countries, while 45% express concerns about EU enlargement towards the East.
Only about a third believe Italy should increase support for the EU-accession of Western Balkans countries.
Only a third see defence as an EU responsibility, and approval for a European Army ranks at 42%, a low figure compared with other EU members. Only 17% favour military interventions. Half believe the EU can't defend itself without the US. Some 57% doubt Italy's ability to defend against a Russian attack, below the European average. As a leader in EU security, most respondents favour Germany (21%) or joint leadership by Germany, France and Poland (14%). Over two-thirds of Italians desire ensuring international peace through other means, such as diplomacy, an expression of multilateralism.
Only 18% of Italians back supporting Ukraine until it wins the war – in contrast to 50% in Latvia or Sweden.
Italy’s defensive, peace-oriented approach contrasts with the more assertive stances of Sweden and Poland. Under Meloni, Italy supports NATO and EU measures against Russia but is among the least enthusiastic EU supporters of Ukraine.
Over 70% see an end to the war as a precondition for peace in Europe and express concern that it will impact Italy’s future. Only 64% hold Russia accountable, lower than most EU countries, and nearly half see the war as expanding Russian territory, below EU and NATO averages.
Some 68% of opponents of increasing Ukraine’s support believe that ending the war is crucial. Only 18% back supporting Ukraine until it wins the war, by far the lowest value of all EU countries (in Sweden and Latvia: around 50%). A notable 19% of Italians, double the rate in Sweden or Poland, believe Russia might prevail on the battlefield. War fatigue, particularly among older generations, contributes to a willingness to consider territorial concessions for peace. Additionally, 53% of Italians believe the EU is shifting its focus away from challenges in the southern neighbourhood.
Regarding Italy’s position on the war against Ukraine, 49% favour diplomatic efforts to end the war, 25% support neutrality. Just over half support more sanctions. Italians are more sceptical than other EU nations about Ukraine joining the EU (42% in favour) and NATO (35% in favour). Only 42% of Italians support further aid to Ukraine, while 34% oppose it. Unlike the trends towards strengthening the military in most NATO countries, half of Italians favour humanitarian aid, followed by military support. Accordingly, 42% oppose third-country intervention.
The EU is most affected by the war, with 37% of Italians perceiving it as unchanged and 36% as weaker. Some 26% believe Russia has gained in strength. Italy is seen as unchanged by 45%.
Italians expect worsening developments over the next five years, maintaining a bleak outlook since 2021.
The Italian foreign policy outlook is not monolithic, though, and has some contradictions. The defensive stance described above sits alongside strong endorsement of an active foreign policy and support for spreading values through foreign policy (57%). This may reflect Meloni’s assertive stance geared towards boosting Italy’s visibility. Nearly 70% of respondents support reducing dependency on countries with different values, similar to EU peers. This contradicts Italian pragmatic stance regarding cooperation with non-like-minded states, mentioned earlier.
Italians’ top foreign policy priorities remain climate change, with a significant rise in support for human rights and geopolitical tensions since the last survey. About half support stronger diplomacy and 37% back global disarmament efforts, the highest share in the poll, and an increase in opposition to military interventions. Confidence in the effectiveness and legitimacy of diplomatic, military and economic measures has declined. This reflects disenchantment with regard to foreign policy, which is unlikely to achieve desired peace scenarios. Unsurprisingly, diplomacy receives the highest approval, particularly from older people. Opposition to military interventions in conflicts increased and is the highest in the poll (74%).
At 26% Italians show by far the lowest support for increasing military spending, 72% prioritise social spending over defence.
Italians are very aware of the risks that climate change poses, even though only 45% of Italians see climate change as a threat to peace, substantially lower than the average. Some 62% favour doing everything to fight climate change, the highest share in the poll. Most Italians are dissatisfied with climate action, with the EU efforts regarded as the most satisfying (23%). Italian respondents show an overall decline in support for cooperation, but 74% see international partnerships as key to combating climate change. A majority also believe that wealthy nations should support poorer ones.
Amid broader trends of rising defence budgets across NATO, Italy has taken a divergent path. Italy has the lowest support for increased military spending among NATO countries, at 26%, well below the 57% average. Resistance to higher defence budgets reflects longstanding Italian attitudes, rather than war fatigue, as the support level in 2021 was nearly identical at 24%. Defence spending has steadily declined, dropping from 1.59% of GDP in 2020 to 1.46% in 2023, with further reductions projected. Italians overwhelmingly favour prioritising social and economic spending over defence (72%), the highest rate in the survey. As a result, if military spending rises, 52% favour a special levy on the rich.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/