Germany, one of the leading EU member states, is navigating a complex mix of challenges. Historically cautious about embracing a dominant global role because of the legacy of Nazi rule and post-war division, the country has nonetheless grown more assertive in pursuing its political and economic interests. It increasingly acknowledges the need to contribute to peace and stability in Europe. However, Germany faces significant economic challenges that threaten its ability to maintain an influential economic position within the EU.The collapse of the »traffic light« coalition, coinciding with Donald Trump's re-election, set the stage for early federal elections in February 2025. This development has introduced a period of uncertainty until the formation of a new government.
Germany, one of the leading EU member states, is navigating a complex mix of challenges. Historically cautious about embracing a dominant global role because of the legacy of Nazi rule and post-war division, the country has nonetheless grown more assertive in pursuing its political and economic interests. It increasingly acknowledges the need to contribute to peace and stability in Europe. However, Germany faces significant economic challenges that threaten its ability to maintain an influential economic position within the EU.
The collapse of the »traffic light« coalition, coinciding with Donald Trump's re-election, set the stage for early federal elections in February 2025. This development has introduced a period of uncertainty until the formation of a new government.
Germans’ primary concerns are wars and conflicts (82%), inflation (79%) and international terrorism (76%). The proportion of respondents worried about uncontrolled immigration has grown from 61% in 2021 to 73% in 2024 and the level of concern increases with age, opening up a 27 percentage point difference between those aged 18–29 (56%) and 60–75 year olds (83%). The dynamic of worries about one’s personal future (2021: 57%, 2022: 71%, 2024: 66%) indicates a growing sense of instability after the outbreak of war and a subsequent stabilisation two years later. However, fears of a worsening personal economic situation have grown (2021: 43%, 2024: 50%).
Germans rank among the most satisfied with their status on the international stage.
On the international stage, about 40% believe that Germany lacks the status it deserves, but Germans rank among the most satisfied with their standing in the survey. Nearly 60% of Germans, consistent with the previous survey and the poll average, believe their prosperity is linked to the well-being of other nations. However, this figure is relatively low for an export-dependent economy.
Germany is an active participant in numerous international organisations, but this engagement is only partially reflected in public attitudes. Support for a larger role for the UN remains low, with only 48% in favour, significantly below the 61% survey average. Support remained steady for an expanded role for the EU (49%), for NATO (47%) and for the OSCE (47%).
Key pillars of German foreign policy include a commitment to the EU, with a majority of respondents (61%) supporting closer cooperation within the Union. However, opinion is split on whether there are conflicts between EU policies and Germany’s interests (43% on each side). This is value up on 2021 (35%).
EU–US cooperation strengthened under the Biden administration, but collaboration with the US receives mixed support, with 46% in favour and 42% opposed. The results reflect hardly any increase compared with 2021 (51% in favour). The interests of the US and the EU are seen rather as aligned (47% do not think that their interests are contradictory).
52% of Germans perceive the media reporting as objective, one of the highest figures in the poll.
Since the onset of the full-scale war in Ukraine, Russia’s image has changed significantly. It is now seen as Europe's biggest threat, with threat perception rising from 51% in 2021 to 73% today. Closer collaboration with Russia and China is widely rejected. Majorities support reducing ties with both countries, even at the cost of a lower standard of living (64% for Russia, 57% for China). Germany has also adopted a »derisking« approach towards China, now perceived as Europe’s second-biggest threat (46%). Nearly 70% agree with reducing dependence on countries that do not share Germany's values.
The perceived divergences of interests between the US and Russia (63%) and the US and China (58%), are seen as most contradictory, higher than those between the EU and Russia (60%) or the EU and China (51%). The picture suggests that the US is viewed as acting within a more tense geopolitical context than the EU. Germany's media is generally recognised as relatively objective, free and diverse. Indeed, it enjoys one of the highest levels of trust (52%) with regard to objective reporting among the surveyed nations, while only a smaller share (37%) perceive the German media as biased.
Germans exhibit a defensive, risk-averse approach, reflected in their historically cautious policies in military affairs and emphasis on dialogue. The vast majority view the end of the war against Ukraine as crucial for improving European security.
A large majority foresee an upcoming era marked by wars and conflicts, accompanied by »my country first« approach. Germans are increasingly worried about being directly affected by wars and conflicts in the future, with the proportion of those concerned rising from 47% in 2021 to 75% in 2024. The perceived risk of wars in Europe surged from 33% in 2021 to 56% in 2024. However, the perception of the likelihood of military confrontation between Russia and the West has declined in the course of the war against Ukraine, dropping from 48% in 2022 to 40% in 2024, below the average of polled European countries (48%). Additionally, 69% believe Germany could not defend itself against a Russian attack, a figure significantly higher than the NATO average of 53%. This is reflected in the stance of the Olaf Scholz government, which has been following a cautious path in supporting Ukraine with reference to potential Russian threats and the danger of escalation.
On security matters, Germans prioritise diplomacy (64%) over the build-up of an EU Army (49%). Some 57% believe that the EU would be unable to defend itself without US support. At the same time, 68% express a desire for more independence from the US. When asked about a potential leader in EU security, Germany is the only country in the Weimar triangle that is more likely to envision leadership alone (30%) rather than together with France and Poland (28%). Although cooperation between France and Germany remains essential, differences in defence, trade and energy policies are increasing. Although Germans are the most confident in their country's ability to take on a leadership role in EU security, paradoxically, survey respondents express the highest support, compared with France, Italy and Poland, for Germany to engage less in the EU (28%, but only 18% among those aged 18–29).
Germans are neither as strong supporters of Ukraine as Latvians or Swedes, nor as opposed as Italians. Instead, they remain cautious.
Their support for a stronger leadership role ranks lowest (25%). Germany's leadership position has diminished on the European stage due to internal divides in the governing coalition, a trend also reflected in the poll. However, the largest share (37%) would prefer to strengthen EU institutions.
A trend of disillusionment and war fatigue is evident. Some 46% believe that the war against Ukraine is not going to end within the next 12 months, the third-highest value among the surveyed countries. Russia is overwhelmingly seen as the aggressor (70%), while Ukraine and the US are blamed by 20% each. In common with most EU member states, except Italy, 31% of respondents attribute Russia's invasion to its imperialist ambitions, while 28% cite long-standing tensions with Ukraine. Few respondents cite as a reason defence of Russia’s interests or an attempt to act as a global player.
Germans are neither as strong supporters of Ukraine within the EU as Latvians or Swedes, nor as opposed as Italians. Instead, they remain cautious, with support declining since the 2022 survey, similar to France. The highest share of German respondents (44%) favour diplomatic efforts. About a quarter support a neutral stance or backing Ukraine until victory, respectively. While 48% support continued assistance to Ukraine (below the EU average of 55%), 36% oppose further support. This is due mainly to a desire for the war to end (72%) or concerns about its cost (18%). A narrow majority (53%, higher than the NATO average of 44%) believe the war should end as soon as possible, even if it results in territorial losses for Ukraine. Only 27% support restoring Ukraine’s territorial integrity, even if it is at the cost of prolonging the war.
Germany's historical military restraint is evident in its continued reluctance, on top of war fatigue among the population. The majority oppose further weapons deliveries (54%) and strongly reject sending troops (79%). Support for Ukraine’s NATO membership (50% opposed, 32% in favour) and EU membership (49% opposed, 36% in favour) has declined since 2022. However, 53% now support expanding sanctions against Russia, up from 37% in 2021. As broader effects of the war, NATO, the US and China are seen as largely unaffected, while Russia is perceived as weakened (33%). The EU and Germany are seen as either unaffected or weakened.
There is a prevailing belief that global developments over the next five years will worsen, which has largely remained unchanged since the last survey: globally (69%), in Europe (59%) and in Germany (53%). This positions Germany, alongside France, as the two most pessimistic countries in the poll.
Germany, alongside France, ranks as the most pessimistic in the poll.
Foreign policy priorities include combating terrorism and extremism (62%, 2022: 42%) and international migration (44%, 18–29: 24%), and tackling climate change (43%). There has been a clear inward turn in public sentiment. Since 2021, concerns about the decline in social cohesion have grown. Some 65% oppose promoting German values abroad, the highest figure in the poll. Nevertheless, 61% are in favour of pursuing an active foreign policy and playing a significant role in tackling international problems.
Internationally, Germans tend to believe that rules and laws in international relations remain relevant. Promoting peace is seen primarily in terms of diplomatic negotiations, considered the most effective and legitimate tool. Key methods include diplomacy (54%, 35% among 18-29 year-olds), disarmament initiatives and strengthening international organisations (about 30% each). Scepticism towards military interventions has risen sharply (from 56% in 2022 to 69% in 2024) and they are perceived as the least legitimate option. The majority oppose nuclear weapons, but 26% of 18-29 year-olds consider them a last resort, twice the 14-country average. German respondents express general dissatisfaction with current climate policies, while the EU's measures receive the highest approval (32%, with 42% among those aged 18–29). A strong majority (68%) still believe that international collaboration is crucial. However, despite Germany's wealth, it shares with the US and Latvia the lowest support for protecting poor and vulnerable countries (59%).
Regarding the government’s approach to new public borrowing and investments, a contentious issue in Germany since the »debt brake« was enshrined in the constitution in 2009, Germans are fairly divided: 45% oppose new debt for future investments, while 40% support it. Notably, support for new debt is lower among those under 40.
Support for increasing military spending is high, with 54% in favour, a 16% increase from 2021. However, 55% reject prioritising defence spending over social expenditures. The preferred method of financing defence is a special levy on the rich (47%), while 24% support cuts in other areas. New borrowing is supported by only 11%, which is the highest proportion in the poll.
Scepticism towards military interventions has risen sharply, from 56% in 2022 to almost 70% in 2024.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/