Poland historically has been caught between Eastern and Western powers. It endured partitions in the eighteenth century, occupation during the Second World War, and decades as a Soviet satellite until the Solidarity movement restored its independence. Poland joined NATO in 1999 and the EU in 2004, planting itself firmly inside the Western alliances. Now, it has emerged as a key player in European security, investing heavily in defence and supporting Ukraine. The recent change of government, headed by Donald Tusk, has brought a pro-European focus and efforts to address rule of law concerns. Tusk's administration has also advocated for stronger EU cooperation in security areas such as border control and cybersecurity. This reflects Poland’s historically security-centred foreign policy, shaped by its location and past experiences with the Soviet Union. Poland's central but vulnerable geographical position has compelled its population consistently to assert their sovereignty, while fostering a persistent desire for robust alliances.
Poland historically has been caught between Eastern and Western powers. It endured partitions in the eighteenth century, occupation during the Second World War, and decades as a Soviet satellite until the Solidarity movement restored its independence. Poland joined NATO in 1999 and the EU in 2004, planting itself firmly inside the Western alliances. Now, it has emerged as a key player in European security, investing heavily in defence and supporting Ukraine.
The recent change of government, headed by Donald Tusk, has brought a pro-European focus and efforts to address rule of law concerns. Tusk's administration has also advocated for stronger EU cooperation in security areas such as border control and cybersecurity. This reflects Poland’s historically security-centred foreign policy, shaped by its location and past experiences with the Soviet Union. Poland's central but vulnerable geographical position has compelled its population consistently to assert their sovereignty, while fostering a persistent desire for robust alliances.
Poles’ biggest concerns are inflation (91%), wars and conflicts (89%), economic crises (84%) and uncontrolled migration (81%).
Some 63% of respondents view Poland's prosperity as linked to the well-being of other countries. Having said that, 64% believe that Poland does not have the status it deserves, a similar number to Italy. This figure is significantly higher than in other polled European countries, such as Germany or France (around 40%), and emphasises Poland’s desire for greater recognition.
People’s personal situations improved slightly compared with 2022: the proportion of people expressing concerns decreased from 83% to 73%, and fears of economic decline dropped from 67% to 46%. Some 62% believe an era of wars and conflicts is emerging. A large majority fear they will affect Poland in the future.
Poland desires strong support for international institutions and robust transatlantic relations. The majority are open to a greater role for the UN, the OSCE and the EU, with NATO receiving the second-highest support in the poll (76%). Some 65% of those surveyed favour more collaboration with the EU. Even with the current pro-European course of the Tusk government, however, half of the respondents perceive their country to be regularly in conflict with the EU, a 10 percentage point increase since 2021. Poland's course of action within the EU should focus on strengthening its leadership (42%), the highest level of support among the surveyed countries, including Italy, Germany and France. A quarter advocate stronger European institutions, a figure notably lower than in Italy (40%) or Germany (37%).
Poland sees the US as a key partner, with 75% favouring more collaboration.
Poland sees the US as a key partner, prioritising security cooperation over calls for greater autonomy. A large majority of 75% favour more collaboration with the US. Just 15% of Poles favour increased cooperation with Russia, compared with 43% in relation to China. Correspondingly, the proportion of people desiring reduced dependence on Russia (73%) is much greater than with regard to China (46%).
Poland’s priority remains countering Russian influence, while China is viewed more favourably but still with some caution.
Perceptions of media reporting have become more balanced, with the same proportions viewing it as objective and as non-objective (43%). Younger people are more likely to perceive reporting as biased.
A broad majority in Poland believe that ending the war against Ukraine is a prerequisite for improving security in Europe. Russia is seen as the primary threat for Europe (82%), followed by China (44%). Concerning Russia, there is a keen awareness of potential conflict. Poland views EU and NATO enlargement as a potential threat to European security (44%). This concern is not significantly higher than in EU countries farther from the eastern flank. Support for a European Army has increased (from 49% in 2022 to 54%). Some 57% still support ensuring peace through non-military means, a 10-point drop compared with 2021. This shift highlights the growing trend towards militarisation.
Poland envisions the EU becoming an active security actor, focusing on regional stability and strong partners. Polish respondents show the lowest support in the poll for becoming increasingly independent of the US in security affairs. Tusk announced an improvement in relations with Germany, and 63% of those surveyed support this. Poland is also improving relations with France, as the three countries resumed the Weimar Triangle format. Some 42% of Poles prefer the trio as leaders in EU security compared with 24% for sole Polish leadership.
63% think Poland should improve relations with Germany. 42% want the Weimar Triangle to lead the EU, more than in any other country.
In the event of a Russian attack, only 31% believe Poland can properly defend itself. Over half (56%) see the EU as unable to defend itself without the US. Younger respondents are more confident, showing greater resolve and trust in EU defence capabilities.
War fatigue has set in Poland, with the focus shifting to national interests.
War fatigue has set in Poland, especially among younger respondents, with the focus shifting to national interests. Although Polish support for Ukraine remains robust within the EU and NATO, public support for Ukraine is declining. Some 35% back Ukraine until victory, 30% support neutrality and 29% favour diplomacy. Support for Ukraine's membership of the NATO (47%) and EU (45%) has also declined since 2022. Nonetheless, Poles see their country as strengthened by the war (34%).
Russia is clearly identified as the aggressor by 81%, although the share of people putting the blame on Ukraine has doubled since 2022 (from 8% to 16%). Asked for the reasons behind the Russian invasion, some 40% cite Russian imperialism, the second-highest figure in the poll after Ukraine. Consequently, 63% view it as territorial expansion (and not as a proxy war or contest between democracies and autocracies).
Opinion on continuing support is split, with war fatigue contributing to a decline. Only about half of Polish respondents, in line with the average of other polled NATO countries, support continued aid to Ukraine. Support is still desired mainly through military means (63%). The wish to send Polish troops has decreased from 21% in 2022 to 15% in 2024. This highlights a growing division on how to balance support with the risk of escalation. There is no majority for more weapon deliveries, although discussions are progressing between Poland and Ukraine on joint arms production. However, only 39% would continue support if the US or Germany stopped their aid. Among the 30% who decline further support for Ukraine, most respondents say it is too expensive (45%, the highest percentage in the poll). Another 36% just want the war to end.
The highest share (42%) believe it is most important to end the war even at the cost of territorial losses for Ukraine, while 30% favour restoring territorial integrity.
The 16% who prioritise Russia losing the war, even at the risk of escalation, is similar to the figure in Sweden and relatively high in the poll. However, many expect the war to end with a diplomatic solution (34%) or not at all (35%). Poland has become a major destination for Ukrainian war refugees, but less than 40% see added value in their presence. Support among the younger generations is even lower. Additionally, 81% wish to protect Polish farmers, particularly on issues related to grain.
Despite a bleak outlook for the next five years, Polish respondents are slightly more optimistic than the poll average. About a fifth expect improvements. A strong majority support an active foreign policy for Poland. Some 62% back the promotion of values abroad, in marked contrast to Germany (25%). However, only 40% want Poland to take more international responsibility if there are no direct benefits.
Regarding climate change, respondents are largely dissatisfied with current measures. They are most satisfied with EU policies among all respondents to the poll. While 46% support all possible measures to combat climate change, 36% emphasise adaptation. Climate change is seen as a global challenge for peace and security (59%). However, 64% think Poland should prioritise securing its borders and competing for natural resources in the global market.
Poland’s foreign policy focuses on security, but reluctance towards military interventions is growing. Foreign policy priorities include combating terrorism and extremism (58%), addressing human rights violations (41%, 48% women and 34% men), and managing geopolitical tensions (40%). There is also a focus on improving defence capabilities (43%). Strengthening international institutions and intensifying diplomatic efforts have less support. Diplomatic measures are considered the most effective (56%), followed by economic measures (49%) and then military action (42%). Military actions are viewed as the least legitimate by 30% of respondents. However, Poland has one of the highest approval ratings (39%, an increase on previous years) for pursuing military intervention in conflicts, alongside the US, Türkiye and Sweden.
Current defence spending for 2024 is 4.2% of GDP, projected to rise to 4.7% in 2025. Our survey reflects that 75% favour higher military spending, with approval increasing in recent years (2021: 53%, 2022: 69%). While 44% prioritise social and economic spending, 38% favour military spending, the highest share in the poll after Ukraine. Higher military spending should be financed by cuts in other budgets such as social spending (remarkable 38%, the highest figure in the poll) or a special levy on the rich (34%). Poland advocates higher military spending, but considers financing Ukraine to be rather costly. This has led the country to prioritise its own defence, with the goal of asserting military leadership in Europe.
With 39%, Poland has one of the highest approval ratings for pursuing military intervention in conflicts.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/