Poland

[aspiring and hesitant]

Poland historically has been caught between Eastern and Western powers. It endured partitions in the eighteenth century, occupation during the Second World War, and decades as a Soviet satellite until the Solidarity movement restored its independence. Poland joined NATO in 1999 and the EU in 2004, planting itself firmly inside the Western alliances. Now, it has emerged as a key player in 
European security, investing heavily in defence and supporting Ukraine. 

The recent change of government, headed by Donald Tusk, has brought a pro-European focus and efforts to address rule of law concerns. Tusk's administration has also advocated for stronger EU cooperation in security areas such as border control and cybersecurity. This reflects Poland’s historically security-centred foreign policy, shaped by its location and past experiences with the Soviet Union. Poland's central but vulnerable geographical position has compelled its population consistently to assert their sovereignty, while fostering a persistent desire for robust alliances.

Self-perception

Poles’ biggest concerns are inflation (91%), wars and conflicts (89%), economic crises (84%) and uncontrolled migration (81%).

Some 63% of respondents view Poland's prosperity as linked to the well-being of other countries. Having said that, 64% believe that Poland does not have the status it deserves, a similar number to Italy. This figure is significantly higher than in other polled European countries, such as Germany or France (around 40%), and emphasises Poland’s desire for greater recognition.

Perception of the world

People’s personal situations improved slightly compared with 2022: the proportion of people expressing concerns decreased from 83% to 73%, and fears of economic decline dropped from 67% to 46%. Some 62% believe an era of wars and conflicts is emerging. A large majority fear they will affect Poland in the future.

Poland desires strong support for international institutions and robust transatlantic relations. The majority are open to a greater role for the UN, the OSCE and the EU, with NATO receiving the second-highest support in the poll (76%). Some 65% of those surveyed favour more collaboration with the EU. Even with the current pro-European course of the Tusk government, however, half of the respondents perceive their country to be regularly in conflict with the EU, a 10 percentage point increase since 2021. Poland's course of action within the EU should focus on strengthening its leadership (42%), the highest level of support among the surveyed countries, including Italy, Germany and France. A quarter advocate stronger European institutions, a figure notably lower than in Italy (40%) or Germany (37%).

Poland sees the US as a key partner, with 75% favouring more collaboration.

Poland sees the US as a key partner, prioritising security cooperation over calls for greater autonomy. A large majority of 75% favour more collaboration with the US. Just 15% of Poles favour increased cooperation with Russia, compared with 43% in relation to China. Correspondingly, the proportion of people desiring reduced dependence on Russia (73%) is much greater than with regard to China (46%). 

Poland’s priority remains countering Russian influence, while China is viewed more favourably but still with some caution. 

Perceptions of media reporting have become more balanced, with the same proportions viewing it as objective and as non-objective (43%). Younger people are more likely to perceive reporting as biased.
 

Perception of European security

A broad majority in Poland believe that ending the war against Ukraine is a prerequisite for improving security in Europe. Russia is seen as the primary threat for Europe (82%), followed by China (44%). 
Concerning Russia, there is a keen awareness of potential conflict. Poland views EU and NATO enlargement as a potential threat to European security (44%). This concern is not significantly higher than in EU countries farther from the eastern flank. Support for a European Army has increased (from 49% in 2022 to 54%). Some 57% still support ensuring peace through non-military means, a 10-point drop compared with 2021. This shift highlights the growing trend towards militarisation.

Poland envisions the EU becoming an active security actor, focusing on regional stability and strong partners. Polish respondents show the lowest support in the poll for becoming increasingly independent of the US in security affairs. Tusk announced an improvement in relations with Germany, and 63% of those surveyed support this. Poland is also improving relations with France, as the three countries resumed the Weimar Triangle format. 
Some 42% of Poles prefer the trio as leaders in EU security compared with 24% for sole Polish leadership. 

63% think Poland should improve relations with Germany. 42% want the Weimar Triangle to lead the EU, more than in any other country.

In the event of a Russian attack, only 31% believe Poland can properly defend itself. Over half (56%) see the EU as unable to defend itself without the US. Younger respondents are more confident, showing greater resolve and trust in EU defence capabilities.

Perception of the Russian war against Ukraine

War fatigue has set in Poland, with the focus shifting to national interests.

War fatigue has set in Poland, especially among younger respondents, with the focus shifting to national interests. Although Polish support for Ukraine remains robust within the EU and NATO, public support for Ukraine is declining. Some 35% back Ukraine until victory, 30% support neutrality and 29% favour diplomacy. Support for Ukraine's membership of the NATO (47%) and EU (45%) has also declined since 2022. Nonetheless, Poles see their country as strengthened by the war (34%).

Russia is clearly identified as the aggressor by 81%, although the share of people putting the blame on Ukraine has doubled since 2022 (from 8% to 16%). Asked for the reasons behind the Russian invasion, some 40% cite Russian imperialism, the second-highest figure in the poll after Ukraine. Consequently, 63% view it as territorial expansion (and not as a proxy war or contest between democracies and autocracies). 

Opinion on continuing support is split, with war fatigue contributing to a decline. Only about half of Polish respondents, in line with the average of other polled NATO countries, support continued aid to Ukraine. Support is still desired mainly through military means (63%). The wish to send Polish troops has decreased from 21% in 2022 to 15% in 2024. This highlights a growing division on how to balance support with the risk of escalation. There is no majority for more weapon deliveries, although discussions are progressing between Poland and Ukraine on joint arms production. However, only 39% would continue support if the US or Germany stopped their aid. Among the 30% who decline further support for Ukraine, most respondents say it is too expensive (45%, the highest percentage in the poll). Another 36% just want the war to end. 

The highest share (42%) believe it is most important to end the war even at the cost of territorial losses for Ukraine, while 30% favour restoring territorial integrity. 

The 16% who prioritise Russia losing the war, even at the risk of escalation, is similar to the figure in Sweden and relatively high in the poll. However, many expect the war to end with a diplomatic solution (34%) or not at all (35%). 
Poland has become a major destination for Ukrainian war refugees, but less than 40% see added value in their presence. Support among the younger generations is even lower. Additionally, 81% wish to protect Polish farmers, particularly on issues related to grain.

The way forward

Despite a bleak outlook for the next five years, Polish respondents are slightly more optimistic than the poll average. About a fifth expect improvements. A strong majority support an active foreign policy for Poland. Some 62% back the promotion of values abroad, in marked contrast to Germany (25%). However, only 40% want Poland to take more international responsibility if there are no direct benefits.

Regarding climate change, respondents are largely dissatisfied with current measures. They are most satisfied with EU policies among all respondents to the poll. While 46% support all possible measures to combat climate change, 36% emphasise adaptation. Climate change is seen as a global challenge for peace and security (59%). However, 64% think Poland should prioritise securing its borders and competing for natural resources in the global market.

Poland’s foreign policy focuses on security, but reluctance towards military interventions is growing. Foreign policy priorities include combating terrorism and extremism (58%), addressing human rights violations (41%, 48% women and 34% men), and managing geopolitical tensions (40%). There is also a focus on improving defence capabilities (43%). Strengthening international institutions and intensifying diplomatic efforts have less support. Diplomatic measures are considered the most effective (56%), followed by economic measures (49%) and then military action (42%). Military actions are viewed as the least legitimate by 30% of respondents. However, Poland has one of the highest approval ratings (39%, an increase on previous years) for pursuing military intervention in conflicts, alongside the US, Türkiye and Sweden. 

Current defence spending for 2024 is 4.2% of GDP, projected to rise to 4.7% in 2025. Our survey reflects that 75% favour higher military spending, with approval increasing in recent years (2021: 53%, 2022: 69%). While 44% prioritise social and economic spending, 38% favour military spending, the highest share in the poll after Ukraine. Higher military spending should be financed by cuts in other budgets such as social spending (remarkable 38%, the highest figure in the poll) or a special levy on the rich (34%). Poland advocates higher military spending, but considers financing Ukraine to be rather costly. This has led the country to prioritise its own defence, with the goal of asserting military leadership in Europe.

With 39%, Poland has one of the highest approval ratings for pursuing military intervention in conflicts.

About Security Radar 2025 

Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.

Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.

The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).

About the Survey

By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:

  1. perception of the current threat situation;
  2. attitudes towards foreign and security policy;
  3. attitudes towards international organisations;
  4. attitudes towards national identity;
  5. attitudes towards the EU, the United States, NATO, Russia and China;
  6. perception of Russia’s war against Ukraine;
  7. perception of climate change and its effects on security in Europe.

Polling during wartime

Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.

Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.

Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).

These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.

Contact

FES Regional Office for International Cooperation
Cooperation & Peace

Reichsratsstr. 13/5
A-1010 Vienna

+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205
peace.vienna(at)fes.de

Connect to us

Team & Contact
Subscribe

Overview More