France, a nuclear power with a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, has historically been a major military and colonial force. For decades, the Franco-German duo was the main driver of the European Union, but more recently their leadership has slowly dissipated as a result of domestic developments in both countries. Nevertheless, President Emmanuel Macron still envisages a »sovereign Europe«, based on aspirations regarding a strategically autonomous EU capable of tackling complex challenges on an equal footing with other global players. France is experiencing significant political instability following the ousting of Prime Minister Barnier in December 2024, the first successful no-confidence vote in over 60 years. This government crisis compounds existing challenges, including growing support for the right-wing Rassemblement National, and widespread protests over pension reforms and rising living costs. These factors have constrained President Macron, raising concerns about the emergence of a power vacuum.
The biggest concerns of French respondents are inflation and the rising cost of living (86%), economic crises (81%), and the impact of wars and conflicts (78%). A large majority (80%) feel safe in their immediate surroundings, but this is slightly below the average in the poll, probably because of recent riots and violent disturbances, as well as terrorist attacks in recent years. Although fears of a worsening personal economic situation have declined, the majority are concerned about their personal future (2022: 71%; 2024: 58%). Perceptions of France's global standing have hardly shifted. Some 41% believe the country doesn't receive the status it deserves (2021: 45%). Still, the French are among the least dissatisfied with their country's status in our poll.
French public opinion underscores the significance of multilateralism in global governance. France supports a greater UN role (60%), although this has declined slightly (2021: 64%). Public sentiment mirrors the French government's rather reserved stance towards NATO, with 48% supporting a greater role and 26% opposing it.
The French believe that the coming era will be marked by a »my country first« mentality (73%), although this is less pronounced among those under 40. A substantial 57% believe that laws and rules in international relations are no longer relevant, significantly more than in other polled European countries, such as Germany or Poland (both around 35%). Opinions about the likelihood of a new world war are split, with most people saying ‘don’t know’ (40%) or ‘yes’ (31%).
57% of the French believe that laws and rules in international relations are no longer relevant, significantly more than in Germany or Poland.
French public opinion reflects a shift towards multipolarity. The French do believe the era of American supremacy is rather over (47%). While 44% still favour increased cooperation with the US, a notable 39% oppose it. A growing role for middle powers, such as Brazil or Türkiye, is expected by 45%, and 38% view Russia as a potential leader of the countries outside the »West«. Only a third view the EU as a global power. Nonetheless, the majority support a larger role for the EU, with opinion divided on the extent of France’s disagreement with the EU. French respondents reject greater cooperation with Russia (65%) and China (54%), coupled with a desire for reduced dependence (67% for Russia, 62% for China).
44% of the French favour increased cooperation with the US, but 39% oppose it.
The strengthening of alignment between the USA and the EU is evident from the French perspective, with the perceived divergence of interests at 29%. In contrast, the perceived divergence between the US and Russia (60%) or China (56%) remains higher than that between the EU and Russia (55%) or China (49%). These perceptions suggest that the US is positioned within a more complex and tension-filled geopolitical context than the EU.
Over 50% of French people do not find media coverage objective, consistent with previous years. This perception may be driven by the fact that the media landscape is owned by a small group of billionaires.
A large majority in France see an era of wars and conflicts emerging, with 74% seeing Russia as a threat for Europe and 43% China. The US is viewed as a threat for European security by 23%. A majority, as in other polled countries, view ending the war against Ukraine as key to improving European security. About half see the EU as unable to defend itself without the US. An overwhelming majority of 78% see France as vulnerable in case of a Russian attack. This is the highest figure in the poll, despite France's history as a military power and its battle-tested deployments. Disillusionment with interventionism is growing, with opposition to military interventions increasing from 37% in 2021 to 61% in 2024. Also, military interventions are perceived as less effective (2021: 50%, 2024: 41%) and less legitimate (2021: 48%, 2024: 37%).
Reflecting Macron’s (futile) efforts to promote European strategic autonomy, France shows the highest support among European countries for an EU Army (56%). Paris advocates a unified EU foreign policy and a European Defence Fund. This position helps to explain its desire to become more independent of the US, with 64% in support, slightly higher than the average across the surveyed EU countries. Still, almost half believe that defence should be handled nationally.
Asked about a potential leader in EU security, 29% name France either alone or as part of the revived Weimar triangle, together with Germany and Poland. While France and Germany's cooperation remains key, differences in defence, trade and energy policies are growing. In any case, France is nearly equally divided on its future role in the EU: 32% favour promoting stronger European institutions, 27% support taking stronger EU leadership, while 27% favour focusing on national interests. Divergent EU priorities are emerging, with Germany envisioning a similar role, Poland seeking a more prominent leadership position, and Italy focusing on strengthening European institutions.
In France, 72% of respondents identify Russia as the primary aggressor in the war. Regarding motives for Russia’s invasion, 32% attribute it to Russia’s imperialist ambitions, while 27% cite the long-standing tensions with Ukraine.
Concerning France's stance, the highest share (37%) favours diplomatic efforts, despite Macron’s unsuccessful efforts to mediate between Russia and Ukraine. Some 28% back supporting Ukraine until victory, with stronger support among older respondents.
Opposition to military interventions increased from 37% in 2021 to 61% in 2024. But France shows the highest support among European countries for an EU Army.
The gap between the desired outcome and its perceived feasibility is highlighted, as only 5% of respondents anticipate a military victory for Ukraine.
Overall, about half favour continued support for Ukraine. Among those, 53% back military and 22% humanitarian aid. Among those opposed to further aid, 48% believe the war must end, and 38% claim that it’s too expensive, the second-highest share after Poland. A majority would welcome more sanctions, while only around a third support increased weapon deliveries, a notable decline (2022: 40%).
Macron’s suggestion of deploying ground troops in Ukraine faced widespread criticism, as reflected in our survey, with only 14% in favour. French opinion on possible EU and NATO membership for Ukraine is mixed, but rather negative. This stance became apparent as early as 2008, when Merkel and Sarkozy opposed Ukraine's Membership Action Plan at the NATO Bucharest summit, leading to the alliance's decision to withhold support for Ukraine's NATO membership. This historical position is now intertwined with war fatigue. The French are neither as strong supporters as the Latvians or Swedes, nor as opposed as the Italians. Support exists, similar to that in Germany, but it remains cautious and has waned compared with the 2022 survey.
As for the broader effects of the war, French respondents largely view it as aimed at expanding Russia’s territory, slightly higher than the average of polled NATO countries. As a result of the war, the US, China and NATO are perceived as stable. Russia and the EU are regarded as having diminished influence. France is viewed as marginally weaker.
There is a prevailing belief that developments over the next five years will worsen: globally (69%), in Europe (56%) and in France (55%).
This places France, together with Germany, as the most pessimistic country in the poll, although the younger generations have a slightly more optimistic outlook.
The top foreign policy objectives are combating terrorism and extremism (54%, higher among older respondents), tackling climate change (44%) and addressing human rights violations (37%). While 49% support all possible measures to combat climate change, 38% emphasise adaptation. President Macron emphasises France’s potential for climate leadership, but dissatisfaction with climate policies is widespread. Still, France and Italy remain the most satisfied with EU climate policies in the poll. Many view climate change actions as an opportunity for transformation, but also as a source of protectionism amid uncertainties.
Almost half of French respondents oppose promoting values abroad, while 35% agree. The value-centred approach demonstrates the strongest reluctance to cooperate with countries with different values, even if they contribute to peace and security. With regard to conflict resolution, diplomacy is seen as the most effective and legitimate measure. Some 42% view intensifying diplomatic efforts as an important priority. Development aid receives the least support (22%), even though it should remain important due to France’s colonial past.
France, together with Germany, is the most pessimistic country, though younger generations are more hopeful.
A majority are deeply concerned about the potential for nuclear escalation. Some 27% of French respondents support global nuclear disarmament, but 23% view nuclear weapons as central to their foreign policy. While 63% oppose their use, the third-lowest figure after Russia and the US, 27% support deploying them as a last resort, a worryingly high proportion.
Public opinion on military spending has shifted due to the ongoing war. Support for a higher military budget has risen from 45% in 2021 to 52% in 2024. Still, about half favour spending on economic and social affairs over defence, with only 25% the other way round. A narrow majority (44%) favour a special levy on the rich, while 28% favour cuts in other budgets. Only 5% support increased borrowing for defence spending. However, France has significantly increased its debt, reaching historically high levels that surpass the European Union's fiscal thresholds, putting it among the countries with the highest debt-to-GDP ratios in the EU.
Security Radar 2025 is a representative public opinion poll conducted in September 2024 among the resident populations in 14 countries: Germany, France, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Sweden, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the United States.
Public opinion may have a substantial impact on political decision-makers facing security issues, particularly at a time of high tensions and major uncertainty. The aim of the Security Radar Survey Series is to track changes in public opinion regarding issues relating to foreign-, security, and defense policy. Prior editions of the Security Radar Survey Series have been published in 2019, 2022, and 2023.
The focus of the Security Radar 2025 is to explore changes in public opinion since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. To this end, we compare two surveys: The first is the Security Radar 2022, conducted in 14 countries prior to the outbreak of the war in autumn 2021, and published at the Munich Security Conference just days before the invasion. The second is the present Security Radar 2025, conducted three year later. This allows us to compare people’s attitudes directly before the invasion with attitudes almost three years into the war. For four EU members – France, Germany, Latvia and Poland – we have three data points to compare (as these four countries featured in the follow-up Security Radar 2023, which explored changes in public attitudes nine months into the war, in autumn 2022).
By »Europe« we understand the space covered by the members of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). In certain obvious cases, however, we use »Europe« interchangeably with »the EU«. When we use the term »the West«, we mean the EU together with the USA. The pollster Ipsos Public Affairs in Berlin was assigned to carry out the fieldwork in twelve of the fourteen countries; in Georgia, the fieldwork was carried out by Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC). In Russia, the fieldwork was conducted by an independent pollster, whose name we decided not to disclose because of the risk of criminal liability. The survey is based on the Security Radar 2023 questionnaire, adapted and extended in line with developments related to Russia’s war against Ukraine. Overall, we explore and compare public opinion on the current security and foreign policy situation in Europe, focusing on seven aspects:
Conducting polls during wartime presents significant challenges, requiring cautious interpretation of the results. In Ukraine, ongoing hostilities in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk regions prevented their inclusion in the sample, affecting the survey’s representativeness. The war has also altered Ukraine's demographics, with millions of people, particularly women, leaving the country and many men serving at the front.
Wartime conditions also increase the likelihood that people will provide what they perceive to be socially desirable responses, potentially skewing results. This may be especially the case in Russia, where repressive laws exacerbate this tendency. Despite these challenges, including Russia and Ukraine in the Security Radar survey remains crucial because of their significant roles in European security. The survey was last conducted in Russia and Ukraine in 2021, a few months before the full-scale invasion.
Data in Ukraine was gathered by Ipsos via online questionnaire. To gather data in Russia, an independent polling company was commissioned, although its identity is withheld to protect it from potential prosecution, given the Friedrich Ebert Foundation's »undesirable organisation« status in Russia. The poll was conducted via telephone, with a shortened questionnaire and some terms adapted to ensure respondents’ safety and from political considerations (for instance, the term »special military operation« was used instead of »Russia's war against Ukraine«).
These adaptations and precautions highlight the complexity of conducting polls in conflict zones and under restrictive regimes. While the data provides valuable insights, it's crucial to consider these limitations when interpreting the results, understanding that they offer a snapshot of public opinion under challenging circumstances rather than a comprehensive view.
Reichsratsstr. 13/5 A-1010 Vienna+43 (0) 1 890 3811 205peace.vienna(at)fes.de
Team & ContactSubscribe
Overview More
More
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/