The Security Radar offers insights into attitudes towards militarisation across the genders. In all three countries, women are consistently less inclined to favour military means. Policymakers should make an effort to consider the potential gendered impacts of security policies they are already implementing. This must go beyond mere virtue signalling. A gendered evaluation of existing security policies is therefore crucial. It can inform future policy responses that prioritise the security of women and other marginalised groups. With the help of a feminist-informed analysis of existing policies, policymakers can ensure that security policies address diverse needs and perspectives instead of perpetuating structural inequalities.

Considering the high IDK quotas in response to questions in the Security Radar, the manner in which all three states communicate their security policies needs to be revised. This gendered analysis of the Security Radar illustrates how women do not (believe they) possess the requisite knowledge of security policies. Women tend to think that security policies are not their concern. That becomes extremely evident when looking at the data on abstract and macro-level questions. By integrating gender-responsive messaging, decision-makers can more effectively address context-specific measures that resonate with very diverse audiences in their countries. For example, in terms of visuals, it is important to showcase women in leading speaking positions. It is also essential to present examples of actual lived experiences. Last but not least, it matters what work is cited and whose words are used. This includes campaigns, press conferences or political education. Most importantly, gender-responsive messaging has to be done via different channels, in line with audiences’ access and ability.